Johnson

Many lenders and buyers/sellers believe that by purchasing title insurance they can skimp on lawyers or even skip lawyers altogether. The current environment is exposing the fallacy in those beliefs.

Unlike most types of insurance, title insurance is not required to make the insured whole upon presentation of a claim. For example, if your house burns down or your car is in an accident, the insurance company writes you a check for the amount of the loss. On the other hand, if you make a claim on your title insurance policy (e.g., undisclosed lien, prior unsatisfied judgment, access problem, boundary dispute, etc.), the title insurance company is not required to pay the loss at that time. Instead, and most commonly, the title insurance company will attempt to “cure” the problem through negotiation or litigation. As one might expect, sometimes the “cure” takes months or even years. Of equal importance, if the title insurance company is able to diligently “cure” the problem, the title insurance company is not responsible for any damages sustained during the delay (e.g., carrying costs, lost buyer, rising interest rates, etc.).

Read The Full Article

Fourth Quarter , 2010

Conventional wisdom among construction lenders holds that a first mortgage is bulletproof to claims by contractors, subcontractors and suppliers. The belief, generally, stems from the fact that lien claimants are subordinate to the construction mortgage and can be “foreclosed out”. The conventional wisdom is usually right.

Read The Full Article

Guaranty Agreements – A Sure Thing or a Paper Tiger?

September 1, 2010

Third Quarter, 2010 A guaranty agreement is generally enforceable and, in practice, a guaranty agreement is enforced the overwhelming majority of the time. However, lenders tend to discuss a guaranty agreement with the same certainty that the sun will rise the next day. This article is designed to outline some of the recurring issues with [...]

Read the full article →

What Is An Assignment For Benefit Of Creditors And Is It For Me?

August 12, 2009

Third Quarter, 2009 In 1987, the Florida Legislature enacted a statutory scheme called an Assignment for Benefit of  Creditors (ABC) more commonly known as an ABC. The ABC process was relatively unknown and seldom utilized until recently. In the last two (2) years, many companies facing insolvency are considering their options (e.g., bankruptcy, ABC, dissolution, [...]

Read the full article →

Non-Competition Agreements. A Balanced Approach To Enforceability.

April 5, 2007

Second Quarter, 2007 Although Florida is regarded as a right-to-work state, non-competition agreements are permissible in certain circumstances. The Florida Legislature has declared that non-competition agreements are enforceable only to the extent “reasonably necessary” to protect a “legitimate business interest” of the employer. The key, therefore, to analyzing the enforceability of any non-competition agreement is [...]

Read the full article →